|









































| |
|

In 1910, in a quiet backwater in
Georgia at The Jekyl Island Hunt Club, there was a meeting whose
simple purpose was the formation of US The Federal Reserve.
Those who attended were: Senator Nelson Aldrich (Nelson
Rockefeller’s maternal grandfather); A. Piatt Andrew, Economist
and Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; Frank Vanderlip,
President of the National City Bank of New York; Henry P.
Norton, President of Morgan’s First National Bank of New York;
Paul Moritz Warburg, a German who was partner in the New York
banking house of Kuhn, Loeb Co.; Benjamin Strong, an aid to J.
P. Morgan.
The Federal Reserve was
incorporated in 1913 and has been creating a completely
unnecessary National Debt ever since. In simple terms, the Fed
creates money as debt. They create money and credit out of thin
air by nothing more than the ruse of “fractional lending” and a
book entry. Whenever the members of the Fed make any loans, that
debt money is the US money supply.
THE TEN ORIGINAL MEMBER
BANKS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
All owned by the
Rothschilds
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Please note that The Rothschild family owns and runs all the
above so-called “American Banks”. Therefore you could safely
assume that the Rothschild family both runs and controls the
whole of the American Banking System. Indeed, Rothschilds is an
old European family which has dominated the European banking
system for centuries. So not even an American runs the US
banking system - a European family cartel manipulates it
completely with impunity.
Rothschild
By 1850, the House of Rothschild represented
more wealth than all the families of Europe. Shortly after
William Patterson formed the Bank of England(est. 1695), its
control passed to Nathan Rothschild and here is how he did it:
Nathan Rothschild was an observer on the day the Duke of
Wellington defeated Napoleon at Waterloo, Belgium. He knew
that with this information he could make a fortune. He later
paid a sailor a big fee to take him across the English
Channel in bad weather. The news of Napoleon’s defeat would
take a while to hit England. When Nathan arrived in London,
he began selling securities and bonds in a panic. The other
investors were deceived into believing that Napoleon won the
war and was eyeing England so they began to sell their
securities too. What they were unaware of is that
Rothschild’s agents were buying all the securities that were
being sold in panic. In one day, the Rothschild fortune grew
by one million pounds. They literally bought control of
England for a few cents on the dollar. The same way the
Rockefeller’s went into Japan after World War 2 and bought
everything 10 cents on the dollar. SONY=Standard
Oil New York,
a Rockefeller Company.
Nathan Mayer von Rothschild(1840-1915), 1st Baron Rothschild,
once boasted:
“I care not what
puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the
Empire on which the sun never sets. The man that controls
Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I
control the British money supply.”
Frederick Morton wrote in his book, The
Rothschilds:
“…the wealth of the Rothschilds consists of the bankruptcy
of nations.”
But the Fed staunchly maintains
that they are a private institution who’s only function is to
serve the US government and its citizens. Well of course they do
!! So, purely out of interest, lets look at those Financial
Institutions that Hank Paulson (ex-CEO of Goldman Sachs) and Ben
Bernanke have “saved” in the recent TARP bail-out:
- Morgan Stanley
- Citibank
- Wells Fargo
- Goldman Sachs
- Bank of America
- Merrill Lynch
- State Street
- Bank of New York
Every single one of these
institutions is either related or has interests and connections
to the original Fed forming cartel of 1910, ultimately run by
the Rothschilds family. These financial institutions have all
been saved as a priority by their cartel buddies within the Fed
brotherhood. How many Mainstreet banks (that’s ordinary
non-Investment Banks) have been saved or helped by the Fed? I
would suggest that the Fed brotherhood’s Wall Street tentacles
and influence spreads long, dirty and deep into the very heart
of the US political infrastructure - which is the only possible
explanation that could adequately explain their inexplicable
untouchableness and apparent freedom of agenda.
Now some other facts about the the Fed:
- The Fed, as a private US institution, pays no corporate
or any other income tax at all to the US government.
- The Fed is allowed to look after US prices and the money
supply - “at their own discretion”.
- The Fed charges interest to the US government for every
single Federal Note it produces. This charge, in the form of
seignorage, is then passed on to the US citizens as an
invisible “inflation tax”.
- The Fed has NEVER been properly audited.
- At their top-level meetings, the Fed keeps no written
records or memoranda.
- The Fed, as a private institution, is headed by an
American banking cartel which, in turn, is under the
complete influence of the European-based Rothschild banking
family.
As a result of The Fed’s
unstoppable financial activity and due to all the rash debt they
have caused within America so consistently over the years, 22
cents in every single US dollar is now foreign owned through all
their self-serving and mutifarious debt instruments. If these
debt instruments were being used properly, then surely the US
National Debt would be coming down wouldn’t it ? But instead,
it becomes painfully evident that the Fed uses these foreign
loans, multiplied hugely by the practice of “Fractional Reserve
Lending” to further create credit, leading to unstable and
untenable mountains of corporate, personal and financial debt.
The US Fiscal Debt is currently running at about $60 trillion
now, which is 6 X the reported National Debt and about 15 X GDP.
These comparisons become even more ridiculous when compared
against the dollar notes in circulation - which is approximately
$600 billion. The Fiscal Debt is therefore 100 X more than the
dollar notes in circulation !! Is this the measure of a
strong economy ? Remember that
the total production of the world economy amounts to $60
trillion alone. David Walker, ex-Comptroller General of
the government GAO has said that in order to pay back this US
Fiscal Debt, every citizen in America would have to pay its
government $480,000 just to break even.
In these current hard economic
times, it seems that the forefathers of the American
Constitution had some real vision. In 1826, the second bank’s
charter was soon to expire and presidential candidate Andrew
Jackson - an avid and honest constitutionalist - campaigned
fiercely against a central bank which was owned and operated by
the international banking element. Here is Jackson’s opinion of
those bankers:
“You
are a den of vipers. I intend to wipe you out, and by the
Eternal God I will rout you out…If people only understood
the rank injustice of the money and banking system, there
would be a revolution by morning.”
-
References:
The Federal Reserve History and Conspiracy
The Federal Reserve: History of Lies, Thievery, and Deceit
David Walker Interview on CBS(Youtube)
October 31, 2008 — slowsmile
Nobody
I know really understands the vastness or the complexity of the
Derivatives Market. But the evidence appears to be that the
dollar, amidst much reverse spin from the US government
corridors, is squirming and hurting bad. But how is this
possible with the dollar so strong now ? Read the following
explanation from the financialsense.com website, and watch the
clock carefully - something nasty is coming.
In
the cited article, Kirby wrote: “What folks need to
understand is that the global OTC derivatives market,
measured in tens or hundreds of Trillions, is virtually all
US Dollar denominated. Its SYSTEMIC failure, which
is now occurring, requires US Dollar balances to clear
(settle) the trades (bets). This has created the
paradoxical global demand for US Dollars, the currency of a
country that is fundamentally bankrupt. By rationing credit
to hedge funds that were naturally levered and ‘long
commodities’ (institutions like JP Morgan routinely took the
other sides of their customers commodities bets, ruining
institutions like natural gas player Amaranth), and propping
up the balance sheets of those who were short commodities
[such as] the Banks. The Federal Reserve led cabal of
Central Bankers have ENGINEERED the collapse in commodities
prices while creating the illusion (of a perverse USDollar
rally). The engineered collapse of the commodities complex
became necessary in the eyes of monetary elites because the
rush for tangibles and corresponding repudiation of fiat
money was becoming manic, as so CLEARLY evidenced by the
emerging shortages of precious metals, gold and silver
bullion.” My rejoinder is that the crude oil price, and many
commodity prices, have come down right before the election,
just like in autumn 2006, a perception we share.
Kirby went on to conclude that “We are CLEARLY going to
HYPERINFLATE!!!!” He steadfastly contradicts shallow
assertions that deflation will dominate the scene. Anyone
observing the money supply acceleration in recent weeks can
easily see this, yet deflationists seem unable to observe
the human response in desperation. We two have frequent
debates between ourselves, whether USTreasury Bond default
will occur or else a big Reflation Episode. It is possible
both will occur. These exchanges will contribute toward a
key section in the upcoming November Hat Trick Letter on the
weekend of November 9. A topic raging lately between us has
been the failures to deliver USTreasurys. This extraordinary
phenomenon highlights the extreme mountain of toxic bond (in)securities
spewed worldwide by the corrupted US financial sector, but
it also highlights the questionable legitimacy of USTreasury
Bonds. One should remember that over $2000 billion in
counterfeit USTreasury Bonds was probably buried under the
World Trade Tower rubble one dark September day in 2001. The
traded volume of USTBonds was recorded to be over $2
trillion above official issuance in USTBonds. So maybe we
are seeing a redux of counterfeit issuance of USTBonds in
order to satisfy unprecedented demand. By the way,
USTreasury management is done, and accounting is done,
almost like a money laundering operation, handled by
JPMorgan. The rise, burial, and revival of supply are all
conducted under the convenient accounting rules permitted by
national security agencies.
Could the failures to deliver USTreasurys, as shown in the
alarming graphic below, be a precursor to actual default? We
will see. Kirby maintains a period of tremendous
hyper-inflation is coming. My forecast is for a possible
USTreasury default, as conditions grow out of control, and
economic disintegration catches the nation by surprise. The
collapse of General Motors could trigger a profound change
in perception concerning the effective implementation of
USGovt and Wall Street bailouts and rescues. Either way,
disruptions like never seen before are on the horizon. The
settlement failures bring into question the integrity of the
USTreasurys as a legitimate market. Their counterfeit from
more supply than issuance is well documented, and rings like
a loud echo to the naked stock shorting chapter of US
financial markets.

October 30, 2008 — slowsmile
In
a recent and significant article from Reuters entitled “China PM
calls on Russia to Fight Crisis Together”, concerning a meeting
of government heads between China and Russia in Moscow, Chinese
Minister Wen Jiabao explained:
“We need a new [World
Financial] system whereby developing nations will have a
stronger say,” he added. “We need to diversify the global
currency system, to support its stability through the use of
different currencies.”
Wen visited Moscow just three
weeks before Russian and Chinese leaders are due to take part in
an emergency summit in Washington, called to discuss measures to
end the current turmoil and to reshape the global financial
architecture. Both Russia and China blame the economic crisis
squarely “..on the inefficiency of the existing financial
infrastructure focused on the U.S. dollar”.
“Reforming the
global financial infrastructure … is an important thing and
most timely now,” Wen said.
Russian Prime Minsiter Vladimir
Putin suggested that switching, at least partially, to the
rouble and yuan in mutual trade could help both countries to
weather the crisis. He added:
“At the moment
the world which is based on the dollar is suffering serious
problems … The situation on the global financial markets
remains difficult,” he told the forum.
“In such
conditions, we need to think about improving the payments
system for bilateral trade, including the use of the
national currencies,” he said.
“This will help
stabilize our national economies, stabilise finance and
stabilise capital markets,” he added.
Both China and Russia have met to
effectively decide what can be done about the volatile dollar,
in preparation for a World Financial Conference in three weeks
time in Washington. From their comments it is clear that both
Russia and China are tired of the dollar’s unstable and erratic
behaviour, and have clear intentions of perhaps decoupling from
the dollar and diversifying their reserves into other
currencies. Currently, China holds $1.9 trillion dollars and
Russia holds $500 billion in their dollar reserves.
If China and Russia as well as
other countries do decide to sell off their reserves and with a
consequent lesser demand for the dollar in commodity purchases,
then all those greenbacks will come back home to America. The US
government will no longer be able to sell its huge Fiscal Debt
abroad in such vast amounts anymore - which would be
economically catastrophic for the US government, leading to
possible inflation or even rampant hyperinflation and
bankruptcy.
From a well-known Chinese
blogsite called Global Voices, here are some Chinese comments
and opinions concerning the dollar situation and the current
financial crisis:
“1. Americans dare not
put money in the banks.
2. The downfall of financial industry would drive people
away from the bonds Wall Street issued, thus its financing
capability would be very much undermined…
5. The dollars are going to devalue so that its status as a
global currency would come to an end.
6. As the largest and second largest holders of U.S.
Treasury bills, Japan and China would be marred due to the
slumping dollar value.
7. Major nations in the world might endeavor to displace
their crisis by the method of war, and a new world war with
the massive use of nuclear weapons is inevitable…..”
“We should know that
China could play a positive role in the crisis as the
largest holder of dollar reserve. The problem is, since U.S
has long been giving troubles to China and trying to impede
the reunification of China. Should we pay back the bad with
good?”
“Yes, we should help it.
But it should be conditional. Though it’s not moral to
bargain that way, we don’t have to feel guilty to do so with
Americans, since that’s the way they treated us. We can
bargain on Taiwan and Tibet issues. What good chips!”
“So as you guys say,
America should never fall, and the entire world ought to
uphold the power of U.S so that it can spend others’ money
to pay and order goods from other countries.”
“China is like
working for U.S, a boss who someday says he has run out of
money, the company going to collapse. However, China
says,”No, you can’t fall, or I will be starving without a
job.” Then the boss says,” OK, then please lend me some
money, so that I can keep the company, and you can keep
working for me.” What a logic!”
The Washington G20 Summit in
three weeks time should prove very interesting.
-
October 30, 2008 — slowsmile

From the above chart it appears
that - after the Carter administration - the Republicans in
majority just love to spend and accumulate debt. And the Bush
family seem particularly adept at spending freely. While the
Democrats in power always worked to pay back the debt. It seems
the Republicans follow the Keynesian and Chicago Economic School
tenets of Debt and Consumerism is a good thing in a strong
economy. However, the Democrats seem to follow Hayek’s
principles from the sterner Austrian School of Economics - whose
main precept is that a strong, rich country can only be measured
from its Savings and Productivity. I’ll leave it up to you to
decide which of these economic methods is madness and which is
sensible in the current US economy.
In my research for this article,
I really found it hard to find believable figures from the US
government websites. They just didn’t seem right. Then I
stumbled across a website called shadowstats.com and saw the
real figures and charts. This site is run by John Williams, who
writes most of the articles. Mr Williams is quite simply
dedicated to accuracy, he is logical and painfully meticulous in
his interpretation of the charts, he even describes the history
of biased government reporting of statistics - President by
President from Kennedy right up until Bush Jnr. From his article
“Government Economic Reports: Things You’ve Suspected but were
Afraid to Ask!”, John Williams says this:
>
·
During the Kennedy administration, unemployment was
redefined with the concept of “discouraged workers” so as to
reduce the popularly followed unemployment rate.
· If
Lyndon Johnson didn’t like the growth that was going to be
reported in the GNP, he sent it back to the Commerce
Department, and he kept doing so until Commerce got it
right. The Johnson administration also was responsible for
gimmicking the accounting that hides most of the federal
deficit.
·
Richard Nixon had a highly publicized war with the Bureau of
Labor Statistics on the unemployment data. Nixon wanted to
report the unemployment rate as the lower of the seasonally
adjusted or unadjusted number, at any given time, but not
specify same to the public. While that approach was
unconscionable at the time and never used, basically the
same methodology was introduced in 2004 as
“state-of-the-art” by the current Bush administration.
>
·
The Carter administration was caught deliberately
understating inflation.
·
Systemic changes were introduced during the Reagan
administration to boost reported GNP/GDP growth on a regular
basis. The wildest manipulations, however, happened at the
time of the 1987 liquidity panic. In addition to
intervention in the futures markets by the New York Fed to
help prop the stock market after the October 19th crash,
direct and heavy manipulation of the trade deficit data,
under the direction of the Federal Reserve and U.S.
Treasury, was used in conjunction with massive currency
intervention to help bottom the dollar and to contain the
currency panic at year-end 1987.
·
The first Bush Administration began efforts at the
systematic reduction of the reported rate of CPI inflation,
and worked an outside-the-system GDP manipulation aimed at
helping with the failed 1992 reelection bid.
shadowstats.com
· As
former Labor Secretary Bob Reich explained in his memoirs,
the Clinton administration had found in its public polling
that if the government inflated economic reporting, enough
people would believe it to swing a close election.
Accordingly, whatever integrity had survived in the economic
reporting system disappeared during the Clinton years.
Unemployment was redefined to eliminate five million
discouraged workers and to lower the unemployment rate;
methodologies were changed to reduce poverty reporting, to
reduce reported CPI inflation, to inflate reported GDP
growth, among others.

· The
current Bush administration has expanded upon the Clinton
era initiatives, particularly in setting the stage for the
adoption of a new and lower-inflation CPI and in further
redefining the GDP and the concept of seasonal adjustment.
As a result of the
systemic manipulations, if the GDP methodology of 1980 were
applied to today’s data, the second quarter’s annualized
inflation-adjusted GDP growth of 3.0% would be roughly three
percent lower (effectively netting to zero percent or
below). In like manner, current annual CPI inflation is
understated by about 2.7% against the pre-Clinton CPI
methodology (would be about 5.7%), and the unemployment rate
is understated by about seven percent against its original
design and what many people would consider to be actual
unemployment (would be about 12.5%).
As to the financial
results of federal operations, the application of accrual
accounting and generally accepted accounting principles to
federal operations shows an actual fiscal year 2003 deficit
of $3.7 trillion, as reported by the U.S. Treasury, versus
the reported cash-basis $374 billion.
When you read conclusive evidence that virtually every US
President since the early ’60s has lied to their trusting
electorate, what hope is there ? And if you trust Obama or
McCain blindly to be honest in reporting dire economic figures
correctly, I urge you to think again carefully. The fact is,
nothing will change - the US political status quo will continue,
undisturbed, uncaring and rotten to the core, and these economic
lies will always flow and persist - unchallenged.
References
All charts are borrowed from
WhiteHouse.gov or
ShadowStats.Com
October 29, 2008 — slowsmile
Since
the ’90’s Russia has steadily constructed pipelines into Europe,
only too happy to supply and pander to the voracious European
appetite for oil and gas. Russia has undoubtedly encouraged this
dependency. These Soviet oil and gas tentacles now supply all
the major European countries with their industrial lifeblood, as
Putin and Medvedev patiently wait for their coming advantage.
With America’s stock market still
pussing and bleeding all over the world’s financial markets,
while the US government’s fiscal debt leaves its economy racked,
bare and weak as the precious dollar value goes up and down like
a yoyo, supported only by abstract statistical lies from the US
government to its own people and the greed of Wall Street, and
as US leaders desperately try to avoid their strained dependency
on Middle East oil, Putin’s indirect plan continues to move
steadily and quietly ahead, completely unhindered by both
America or Europe.
In the recent conflict between
Georgia and Russia, NATO’s reaction must surely be described as
feeble. This weak political and martial response by Europe is
quite evidently governed by stark economic fears. Energy is the
lifeblood of any nation and Europe’s political mettle has
recently been tested hard. Georgia wanted to join NATO, but
Angela Merkel - the German Chancellor, vetoed against Georgia
joining - amidst weak protests from France, UK and the US.
Germany is a big and symbiotic industrial partner for Russia -
Germany supplies the technology and organization, and Russia
endlessly trickle-feeds Germany her precious oil and gas. If
Georgia - on the border with Russia - were to be allowed into
the NATO fold, Russia would not be very pleased. And all Putin
would have to do is turn off the oil and gas taps into Europe as
he has already done against his own rebellious satellites in
recent years. Therefore, as perceived by Putin, Merkel and other
European states, Georgia is surely a paltry sacrifice to pay as
compared to the dire economic need for the persistent trickle of
black Russian oil into Europe.
So, as Russia’s oil influence and
dependency spreads inevitably like a surreptitious pox across
Europe, the political tide will undoubtedly shift and change -
the tug of Russia’s political sway too strong to resist, since
Europe - for her own economic survival - must soon eventually
bow and scrape in deference to Russia’s policies. And so, as
Russia’s influence steadily blooms into outright dominance, this
subtle takeover will be complete and a new hegemon is born.
In the bloodless aftermath,
America will become more isolated and politically friendless - a
lone, bewildered animal left to forage and fend for itself.
Russia, in partnership with the likes of China, Venezuela and
certain other countries in the Mid-East, will persist and
continue to hurt America - and through America’s own callous
loss of control over her currency - this cabal will be able to
silently attack and wrong-foot America economically until the
dollar falls big and - because of the American government’s
careless laissez-faire attitude towards its own huge
fiscal debt - dollar hyperinflation and bankruptcy will arrive
to eventually decimate American World Leadership and lay waste
the American Way, abruptly to dissolve into a forlorn and
forgotten memory.
Of course this could never
happen, could it ?
Keep praying.
-
References:
A Study in Collapse by J R Nyquist
The Monster at the Bottom of the Abyss by J R Nyquist
Inflation, Money Supply, GDP, Unemployment and the Dollar -
Alternate Data Series - by John Williams
Menu of Pain by slowsmile
The Ravages of Ignored US Debt by slowsmile
 |
| |
|